After watching a rather emotionally intense
film on a long-haul flight, I decide to switch to an episode of Simply Nigella. It reminds me of the
comfort provided by turning on MasterChef
at the end of a tiring day of teaching and meetings. The only caveat is
that this is not the simplistic comfort of nostalgia for lost homes and
cultures, even though it may have some link to a real or imagined past. In my
case, it combines leisure, domesticity and research, and who could resist such
televisual versatility?
The said episode begins with Nigella Lawson
reveling in the pleasure of both consuming and making food, and stating how
comforting it is to begin her day with avocado on toast and the daily
newspaper. She even goes so far as to call it the ‘fabric of her life’. Only
the domestic goddess herself could get away with a ‘recipe’ for avocado toast
on prime-time network television (that happens to also make its way to in-flight
entertainment)! She does, however, add dill to her version, and garnishes the
darn thing with such pretty-looking radishes that one has newfound respect for
that humble root vegetable.
I can’t recall precisely when this food
choice became comfortable. It may have been when an ex insisted on having avocado rather than store-bought
guacamole on his toast. However, I don’t associate my attachment to avocado
toast with an individual or an event – it has become something I have made into my own ritual.
Nor is it a simple case of wanting the cultural capital accrued to having
avocado on toast for breakfast in contemporary, middle class Australia. Perhaps
this is not dissimilar to people who make and consume certain foods, or watch
food television to derive sensory pleasure rather than acquire/demonstrate
skills or cultural know-how. It may not be possible to entirely dissociate this
from the formation of middle class taste cultures, but affective attachments to
food and food media cannot be solely explained by the desire to appear more
upwardly mobile.
Further in the episode, Nigella reveals
that she has just returned from a long-awaited trip to Thailand, where she saw
many unfamiliar vegetables. She then shows us snapshots of said produce,
highlighting her interest in ‘green and pink’ things. We also see a picture of
her with frizzy hair at the beach, and are thereby let into her world like an
intimate friend dropping by for a snack and a chat. The snack in question is
her take on stir-fry – she makes Thai glass noodles with prawns in a dark sauce
consisting strong spices such as whole cinnamon and aniseed. In the moment of
tossing together the noodles and sauce in the wok, she explains that this is
not so much a case of using unfamiliar foods, but using familiar ones in unfamiliar
combinations. So, while the avocado on toast in the previous segment was a
straightforward case of comfortable food, the Thai noodles embody the
comfortingly unfamiliar.
It would be easy, again, to offhandedly
dismiss the ‘comfortingly unfamiliar’ as white middle class interest in exotic
food catered to their palates, and served on a platter in inner city
restaurants (Ghassan Hage’s moniker for this phenomenon is
‘cosmo-multiculturalism’). I am not sure that Thai noodles are the recipe for
anti-racism or more inter-cultural interaction. At the same time, what we
understand as Thai cuisine is too popular in Sydney to be unremarkable.
According to a recent article in The
Sydney Morning Herald, Pad Thai is the city’s most popular take-away item.
In fact, Pad Thai might be to Sydney what pizza is to New York, and Chicken
Tikka Masala in to London. On a recent trip to Hong Kong, I was craving Thai
flavours and came across a blog post by as Australian traveller suggesting that
only one restaurant on the island came close to matching the Thai food
available in Sydney.
Sometimes a desire for the unfamiliar can
become the fabric of life. When and where is a matter ripe for research, and
food television.
No comments:
Post a Comment